Tuesday, October 31, 2006
The North Koreans must thing the west is so naïve and stupid; and after all why shouldn’t they. After testing a nuclear bomb all they got was a light wrist slap by the ineffective United Nations, which was hampered down by competing countries at the Security Council. Of course now they are willing to play the political game, resume “talks” of disarmament. After all it makes the West feel better so why not indulge them for a bit. Then, like the Iranians and the Iraqis before them can continue to create weapons of Mass Destruction while the world at the seat of stupidity continue saying, “See they don’t want to hurt anyone, they’re talking to us and they’ll us nuclear capabilities just for civilians.” This might seem more convincing if North Korea actually cared about their civilians, but seeing as how they have the worst standard of living in the world, including all of the African nations suffering from famine, aids, and war. The West has set a bad precedent for other nuclear seeking powers like Iran. These countries and their leaders do not understand anything other than power, the “power” of negotiation and words means nothing to them. North Korea and Iran will continue to play the UN game while doing exactly what they want. When is the West going to learn that UN diplomacy is a failure and so will be these “talks”.
“Stuck in Iraq”
Kerry’s claim of a botched joke that went as follows, "You know, education, if you make the most of it, if you study hard and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq. ..." doesn’t change the fact that either way, whether he made fun of the troops or President Bush, he and the democrats are causing America to lose the war not only in Iraq but in the Arab street in general. Maybe the quote should be: “You know, education, if you make the most of it, if you study hard and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck as a Democrat.” Much like in Vietnam our enemy is playing our Media and sectors of our government, including our Intelligence Agencies, against us. We can militarily win this war but we will lose it if important members of congress continue making botched jokes and statements. We are in Iraq because our government was smart enough to realize that we needed to go on the offensive in the war against Radical Islam. However, we will lose this war because the Democrats are going on the offensive against the Republicans rather than presenting a united front to our enemies. Just because the rest of the world says that we are wrong does not mean that we are, it just means that we have a harder time in fighting for what is right. So Kerry’s continued defense of his lame joke only continues to prove that he has no understanding of the world today. It is ok if we don’t have a strong coalition people still need to fight what is evil. In a fascist or communist country where the freedoms are minimum there will always be people fighting for the rights of humanity, just because there are few doesn’t mean that there cause is wrong. We as a society and a civilization are lucky that there has always been a brave few to stand up to the weak majority and the tyrannical dictators and now Islamic Fascists.
Sunday, October 29, 2006
We Have to Be Tolerant…No, Really We Have to Be Tolerant
As Tony Blair is leaving office the United Kingdom has decided that they need to improve their image on the Muslim Street by being more “tolerant” of terrorism and the conflicts created by terrorists and Islamic Fascists. After all it’s best not to upset the terrorists or they’ll attack you. Oh, wait, they’ll attack you anyway after all you aren’t wearing a Chador, are you? The British want to be an open, free, and tolerant country, right? That’s why they want to implement this new policy of weakness? Oh wait what about the “Spooks” episode being openly and blatantly anti-Semitic? Well, they’re just Jews and they can’t rape, kill or hurt us in anyway. So why should we be tolerant of them? In the twenty first century tolerance apparently means being obedient to the mighty Muslims for non-Muslim infidels and for Muslims it means allowing Dhimmis to live. In the mean time the Jews apparently are not tolerated on either side.
Thursday, October 26, 2006
Where is the Outcry?
If a Catholic Priest or Rabbi were to state that women clad in revealing outfits were bringing on rape the Western world would be up in arms. Members of the press such as the BBC would lambaste the clergy’s forthright statements. However, when Australian Islamic leader, Sheikh Taj Din Al Hilaly spouted off saying that women were like meat who when dressed inappropriately lead men to rape them the outcry has been subdued by officials. In his “Islamic” logic he claims that it is the fault of the woman if she is raped not that of the uncontrolled male rapist. This chilling speech leaves many around the world concerned with Islam; unfortunately there are others like Nick Bryant of the BBC who is more concerned about the Muslim backlash then the fact that an Islamic Imam is inciting men to rape women. This begs the question why is the west judging Islam on a different standard? If white Christian men were to act in this manner they would be castigated without any fear restraining the outcry of the public, but because the man is Muslim and there are tensions between the two groups, caused by Muslims, it has now become more of a concern as how the white man will retaliate on the streets? It is true that all Muslims do not deserve to be attacked for these statements, but it is also true that they need to stand up against the hate filled, misogynist speech of this and other Muslim leaders around the world. It is precisely because the West acts weak and backs down that the fight against Islamic fascism is entering the streets in places such as Australia. Why are our western governments not protecting us and why do we insist that we must be kind to those who want to rape us because of how we dress? Of course we can all be like the French and rather than attack the attackers, attack the victims and impose laws on women that will restrict them from wearing bikinis in their own cities.
Hypocrisy of Gas
A disturbing ad is running on national television for Citgo Oil, showing picturesque scenes and Citgo stating, “we’re fueling more than your car.” If this was another company these images wouldn’t be so disquieting. However, the fact that the oil provider of Citgo is the anti-American country of Venezuela, led by Hugo Chavez, the message combined with a variety of other political events makes this ad extremely alarming. While Chavez was visiting the United Nations he went to low income areas in the United States in order to garner support for himself through the bribe of low oil costs. It seems that many Americans are all to ready to forgo their ideals in order to gain access to low costing fuel sources. This is especially ironic considering the fact that many of the Americans who are ok with this are the same that claim George Bush went into Iraq only for the oil. Apparently, hypocrisy when it comes to oil can be claimed on both sides of the political divide. For example US Representative William D. Delahunt of Massachusetts was all to willing to make a deal with Chavez in order to lower cost of heating during the winter months last year in exchange for political favors. At least with Bush and his administration oil is an important issue because they are trying to end the ability of terrorists to hold the West hostage through blackmail with oil; whereas the left is just pandering to a belligerent, anti-American, anti-Semitic dictator for their own financial and political gain.
Monday, October 23, 2006
A Loss of Civil Rights or Our Freedom?
In pursuing seats in the coming elections in November the Democratic candidates are claiming that the Republicans in power are curtailing our civil rights. People on the far left take it a step further and state that we are under a fascist leader. Clearly those on the far left have never lived under fascism nor understand what a fascist state is truly like. Perhaps they should go and live in China for a while or hang out in the up in coming fascist country of Russia. What our Democrats are failing to recognize is that there is a huge difference in using laws such as the Patriot act and listening into some conversations of known terrorists (from outside the United States who are speaking to people in the US) with installing wire taps on every phone in the United States and completely ignoring all rights of US citizens in every facet of our lives. However, this is what the Democrats are claiming George Bush and his administration are doing to the American people. In reality George Bush and the people around him have realized that we are fighting a global war not just against terrorism but for the freedoms that our country holds so dear. We can choose to not use wire taps or the Patriot act to fight terrorism but at that point we are also choosing to one day give up all our rights to Islamic Fascists. These rights include but are not limited to things that we hold so dear that they are secured by the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights. We will lose and so might I add will the left, which loves to condemn our government, that right to free speech, press and the ability to address our government regarding the grievances we have. In addition we will lose our right to freedom of religion unless you consider choosing between Islam, slavery, and death to be “free”. We live in a time when decisions need to be made and the sad reality is that we cannot be so naïve to think that freedom is “free”; there are sacrifices that we all need to make. Unfortunately the Democrats want to have their cake and eat it too and that in today’s world is not a choice. We must realize that giving up some of our privacy does not mean giving up our civil rights; however, if we do not give up any of our privacy we will give up our freedom and the life we cherish so much in the United States.
Monday, September 25, 2006
European Nations are Whores on Drugs
It has become more and more apparent in the world stage that the Europeans are vying to revive their power. They feel that they were the leaders of the world and miss that position desperately and therefore, like whores on drugs they are willing to pimp themselves out to any nation or group that will undercut the USA and her power. Much like these whores addicted to drugs they carelessly continue their behavior disregarding the warning signs that if they continue indulging themselves they will overdose and die. Europe is playing a dangerous game of enabling countries like Iran and North Korea to continue their clearly belligerent behavior. The most obvious case is France refusing to put sanctions on the nuclear seeking dictator of Iran. After all Ahmadinejad says he wants to destroy Israel what does that have to do with them? They think that by sacrificing countries like Israel and America to the Islamic Fascists and other power seeking dictators like Chavez that they will regain their thrown. This thinking is short-sighted and shows how the drug induced state of Europe is completely destroying our western civilization. It would be nice if they decided to go into rehab and realize that cheering on snide remarks at the seat of the international community is a petty and self destructive move on their part. Apparently a few bombings won’t deter them from allowing Islamic fascists from destroying their countries and cultures…maybe they’ll just wait until they are bred out or nuked out of their homes? Or maybe they'll wait until the sword is at their throat, choose conversion to praise Allah and allow western women to become enslaved?